On 4/5/06, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quite why he thought that was an 'attack of the mailing list police' I > don't know. If this _was_ one of the mailing lists that I police, then > the offending mail wouldn't have got through in the first place -- I > filter and reject for that. > > Smooge, you no longer work in an environment where it's mandatory to > react harshly and negatively to simple technical requests -- I _know_ > you're only doing it for fun and for old times' sake now :) > Ve have not lost our vays! Actually I wasnt trying to be a prick and sorry if I came across that way. I was remembering the scorching that I got from not sending compliant emails at one point. I just remember that my proposal for getting you completely reassigned to IS for 6 months to fix all our problems got squashed by management. I figured everything would either be fixed, or you would have broken like the rest of us into gibbering horrors that live in the basement. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
