David Woodhouse <dwmw2 <at> infradead.org> writes: > I explained the problem -- which he may not have noticed, although I'm > not entirely sure how that could be the case since his mail isn't part > of the thread to which he was replying. I asked, nicely, if he could > possibly try to fix it. He noticed, all right, but was too lazy to do much about it, I'm afraid. My bad and all that - neither IMP nor Evo have anything to do with any of it. > Quite why he thought that was an 'attack of the mailing list police' I > don't know. If this _was_ one of the mailing lists that I police, then > the offending mail wouldn't have got through in the first place -- I > filter and reject for that. That part of my post was followed by a ;-), which would sort of imply a joke. I was just trying to make fun of your "very rude" qualification. I would qualify what I did as "inconvenient" or maybe even "not very nice", but I think you were being just a tad too serious with "very rude", so I tried to joke about it. Ah, don't worry, it's all good. I'll try harder to follow the threads next time. PS. This is being posted from gmane. Normally, I just read mailman archives, which doesn't have this fancy interface, hence the "fake" e-mails. -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
