Re: Move Evolution to Extras?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, 04 April 2006 at 15:03, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 4/4/06, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Evolution is fairly much broken in FC5, and there's little movement even
> > on the 'this mail crashes Evolution' bugs, let alone the "Evolution is
> > totally unusable with IMAP" bugs.
> >
> > What are we going to do about it? One option might be to move it to
> > Extras in the hope that someone will actually start to look after it
> > there. Or perhaps just drop it entirely? Any better ideas? Volunteers?
> 
> Difficult to do considering the depchains. If you want beagle in Core
> then evolution has to be in Core with the current packaging.  beagle
> needs evolution-sharp which needs evolution.
> 
> -jef"though my candidate for wackiest depchain in Core right now is
> rhythmbox's dependancy on totem through the libtotem-plparser.so.1
> library"spaleta

Here's another wacky one:

mail-notification depends on evolution, gnome-pilot, NetworkManager and named.

Regards,
R.

-- 
MPlayer developer and RPMs maintainer: http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression
to develop psychic muscles.
	-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux