> > Erm and thats a problem how? Aren't most SIS chips integrated on x86 > > motherboards? I know SIS has made a few videocards, but I wouldn't > > expect on in a PPC machine, can't you make this disabling arch > > dependent? > > I have an SiS card lying around somewhere. It's pure fluke that it was > the Matrox I picked up to stick in my Pegasos the other day rather than > the SiS. > > Non-portable code is broken code. I'd much rather see it just getting > disabled -- we can be more pragmatic in the run-up to a release, if it > isn't actually fixed by then. > > Per-arch exclusions are _always_ bad, because they tend to get forgotten > about. Is/Should there be a bug report so that its not forgotten about to be reinabled for select arches in the lead up to a release? Pete -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
