Elektra's technical suitablity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Joe Desbonnet wrote:

As far as I can tell Elektra does not support configuration schemas.

If I am not mistaken Elektra currently treats all plain text key values as strings. I think this is a feature and not a limitation. Elektra is friendly towards existing application configuration schemes. If it enforced key types (Integers, floats, strings etc...) things get a lot more complicated and it is not clear this is the right place to enforce it.

Perhaps enforcing the input types at a configuration builder API makes more sense, keeping libelektra free of the added complexity?

Cheers,
Shane


On 4/2/06, Shane Stixrud <shane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Avi Alkalay wrote:

http://www.libelektra.org/Gnome_and_KDE_Integration


This thread has gotten off track IMO.  Does anyone care to critique
Elektra from a technical stand point on its suitability as a Fedora
configuration engine?

So far the technical critiques have been based on invalid assumptions.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux