Le dimanche 02 avril 2006 à 01:37 -0800, Shane Stixrud a écrit : > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 04:44 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote: > >> Good: Exim; dhcp; xinetd (as opposed to original inetd although the basic > >> ideas are similar, the directory structure allowing split files is a big > >> improvement over the single .conf file). > > Apache, squid, Xorg, gdm. > > Interesting. Tell me what is the best way to enable XDMCP in gdm via a > configuration script? I'll give ya a hint Enable=false is often defined > in multiple places within gdm.conf and the line numbers for these > statements have and will change. > > Configuration files that require either a) manual editing or b) complex > error prone scripting are _NOT_ "Good". But why is the gdm conf file such crap ? Is this because gdm writers had not lots of advanced configuration file libs at their disposition ? No It's because they consider : 1. the conf file is none of the user business 2. as a result little thought went in key naming 3. and even worse the keys themselves are not stable from release to release How is elektra going to help with this ? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
