Re: Split-off package config from release note packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 02:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> My personal view: ATrpms is trying to add value to fedora (and RHEL),
> and I wonder why there have to be so many alienations towards
> ATrpms. People of the fedora community complain about market loss to
> Ubuntu due to non-coherent community of fedora and semi-official
> statements like the one in the wiki just divide the fedora community
> further.

Stop replacing core packages. That's all you have to to. If you have a
problem with a core package, file a bug report. Don't replace it.

And move what you can into Extras.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux