Le vendredi 31 mars 2006 à 14:47 -0600, Ian Pilcher a écrit : > Dave Jones wrote: > > There are a number of other cards, where the situation is worse. > > Short of running their binary driver, the Matrox parhelia is > > a really expensive way to run the vesa driver for example. > > (The mga driver doesn't support anything newer than g550 iirc). > > So why is everybody so hell-bent on making basic desktop functionality > dependent on 3D performance? Probably because nowadays using 2D primitives on hardware designed to do 3D is not that much easier and a lot less efficient than doing 3D directly. At least that's how I understood the 3D people arguments. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
