sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > But you're making some rather unsupportable assumptions about whether > the changes you desire will really lead to the outcome you hope for. Read up on the distinction between "necessary" and "sufficient" sometime. I'm advocating necessary changes, I have not represented that they will be *sufficient*. > You've refused to acknowledge that there are other alternatives > in the Linux landscape already doing the exact same thing you want > Fedora to do. And that would be who, exactly? > And you've refused to articulate why every > distribution must follow this same course of action. No, just the ones that want market share among non-technical users. Or, taking a larger view, Linux fans who actually want to do something to stem the tide of creeping DRM and locked-down video card and the like. To prevent that, we need to be the 800-pound gorilla, not a niche product appealing to techies only. > You're trying to take choice away from people. OK, you've devolved into sputtering ga-ga incoherence now, Go take a tranquilizer. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
