Re: The Strengths and Weakness of Fedora/RHEL OS management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/30/06, Avi Alkalay <avi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hummm, never heard about puppet. Seems interesting.
> The problem I see with this approach is the additional layer that manages
> the configuration files syntax. And again: ALL configuration files can be
> represented by an hierarchy of key/value pairs. They are different because
> they received a considerable amount of syntax fat to make them look nicer to
> your human eyes. And what puppet seems to do is try to work with this fat.
>

What would be really cool is to have a file-system based configuration
system, where a config file is mounted into a user space or kernel
file-system driver. Then programs could use whatever config file
format they like, and as long as there is a translation module for it,
people can change/view things with simple echo/cat commands. Like
/proc/sys/.
Eg: cat 80 > /conf/httpd/Listen

Probably just madness,
n0dalus.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux