Re: Package names in FC5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:47:50 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:

> > No pattern. Core package developers can do what they want, and some of
> > them still don't seem to care that .fc3 is "newer than" .FC5 in RPM
> > version comparison.
> 
> That's a bit of an exaggeration.  It's not that we don't care, it's that
> it doesn't matter unless you're doing something *else* really dumb at
> the same time as *switching* between those two nomenclatures.
> 
> *yawn*.

No need to yawn. :) It has happened before that a package from Core was
moved to Extras or vice versa, and then you get the "switching" in updates
unless the different packagers agree on a common way.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux