On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:54 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 05:13 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:09:16PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > That's wacky. Doesn't happen on an X40, thank goodness. Which is interesting, > > > because several of my sources claim the T40 and X40 are electronically > > > identical, with X40 just being skrunched into a smaller form factor. > > > > The old IDE layer does not support suspend/resume. The failure in this case > > is just an example of that, in this case cause by corruption of the HPA > > limits > > Speaking of which, I've got a patch that duplicates our current startup > breakage in the resume path. Which is to say, since we've already > screwed up the data that's in the protected area, this just disables it > again during resume, so you don't get IO errors. > > http://people.redhat.com/pjones/hpa/linux-2.6.16-hpa-resume.patch > > Also, http://people.redhat.com/pjones/hpa/ is a yum repo with the > 2.6.16-1.2080 kernel from cvs rebuilt for i686 with this patch. I hope > this was a good kernel to test with, or davej will surely come make fun > of me ;) I haven't tested it yet, but just as soon as I finish this > email I'll try it on my laptop. I'll put x86_64 packages up when they > finish building. OK, the x86_64 packages are there too, now, and I've also tested this kernel on my laptop. Seems to work, and suspend/resume does the right thing. -- Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
