On Wednesday 22 March 2006 04:40pm, David Kewley wrote: > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:38, Dimi Paun wrote: > > From: "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > * Disk change indicators > > > > > > This comes up from time to time, I'm just not fully convinced of how > > > useful it is. > > > > Coupled with a better time estimate, it would be useful, no doubt. > > Also copying the contents of the CDs to the HD before hand would be > > a very good idea too. But when that's not possible (due to free > > space constraints), the ticks would be nice :) > > A suggestion if this gets considered: dd the CD to a .iso file on disk, and > mount it loopback. That way you avoid slow CD seeks. In almost all cases, it will be much faster to do installs via NFS over 100Mbps than via CD/DVD. It's probably sixes on "average" hardware to do NFS vs same hard drive, speed-wise. However, it's much more convenient and easier to set up the network install once and use it whenever you need it than it is to set up for hard drive installs each time. Also, don't forget to count the time to copy the disc image(s) from CD/DVD to hard drive. Putting the ISO(s) on a USB2.0 hard drive and doing the installs from that is quite fast. To do that, I usually use a boot.iso CD to launch the install and get everything else from /dev/sda1 or /dev/sdb1 as the case may be. -- Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] GPG Key fingerprint: F98C E31A 5C4C 834A BCAB 8CB3 F980 6C97 DC0D D409
Attachment:
pgpMptytB0WjF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
