On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 15:56 -0500, Max Spevack wrote: > For those of you who don't yet know me, let me introduce myself. I've > been with Red Hat for about a year and a half, and over the course of the > last month I've transitioned from an engineering and quality assurance job > into a new role as Red Hat's Fedora Project Leader. > > My job is to represent the Fedora Project within Red Hat, to work with all > of the leaders within the Fedora Project (the leaders within the community > as well as inside of the Red Hat fenceline), and to set priorities and > direction at the level of engineering, budget, testing, branding, > marketing, and community building. How does this affect Rahul Sundaram and his position? Not that I am trying to butt into Red Hat's business or whatever, just that he seems to be the voice of Red Hat/Reason since this beta cycle began and just seeing who we will be talking to, and who will be making decisions on things and such. Maybe an explanation/diagram of who reports to who, and who says what type thing? (as in , developers to Rahul, Rahul to you, you to a committee, etc..? something like that). Might let us all understand how this works as far as names and stuff *shrug*. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "It's only funny until someone gets hurt, then it's hilarious!" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
