Re: which gstreamer versions in official fc5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:47 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
> > On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > > I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of
> > > the FC5 release.
> > > 
> > 
> > Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5?
> > I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with
> > 0.3.0 due to the api change.
> It was considered, but it requires the new notification daemon, and the
> new notification daemon requires libsexy which we don't ship.  At the
> time, it was a bit late in the development cycle to add a new package to
> the distribution.
> 
> If you file a bug though, maybe we can do something.  For instance, make
> libsexy configure time optional or something.  Hard to say at this
> point.

Ray, thanks for the update.  I glanced at the latest notification daemon
tarball, and it looks fairly straight forward to make the libsexy
dependency option.  The only use of libsexy is in the theme.c file, and
it involves sexy-url-label.  If I've got some time this weekend, I'll
work on a patch to make libsexy option.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux