Keith Sharp (kms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Harald Hoyer (harald@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > What do you think about the attached patch to ifup-wireless? Works for me :) > > > > This should really be done in NM. > > I may have the wrong end of the stick, but what about the increasingly > common situation where wired access to Ethernet switches is beings > controlled by 802.1x authentication? I understand that NM will handle > the laptop/workstation with GUI case, but what about servers? And how > does NM handle static IP addresses? NM needs to move to handle these sorts of things; shipping two infrastructures is silly. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
