Thank you, Jesse, for the explaination. On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:35:06 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:24 -0500, Philippe Rigault wrote: > > Sure, only 2442 RPM packages have been rebuilt out of 2442. > > Um, no. These were rebuilt before Test3, and the reason why Test3 took > a while because we wanted to get these built FOR test3 so that they > would get TESTING. I see, I misinterpreted the fact that all packages have a last modification date of March 6 or after, it is true that most carry the same name as in test3. Most of them have therefore been touch'ed and not rebuild, right ? And since packages based on gcc-4.1.0 and glibc-2.4 stable were indeed rebuilt after test 3, it means that most packages on FC5 will have been built with an earlier gcc/glibc (pre-release), different from that distributed in the release. As a consequence, if one takes an FC5 SRPM and does a 'rpmbuild -bb', the rpm may contain differences from the native RPM disributed with FC5. Am I right on these points ? Maybe this deserves a little note in the release notes (unless I am the only one who was confused). Thanks. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
