On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:06PM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Two packages that I recently submitted for review ('rogue' and 'ularn')
I was always under the impression rogue (and rogue clone) didn't meet the
Fedora licensing requirements as it was non-commercial only
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
