Re: Virtual machine software for Fedora testing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2006/2/24, Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:06:14AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 14:43 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > > I don't think VMware
> > > does anything other than i386 running on i386 (unlike qemu).
> >
> > It can also do x86_64 running on x86_64, even if you're running a 32-bit
> > OS. It can also do limited SMP.
> >
> > > Qemu would be a good extras candidate.  I'm a bit surprised to see its
> > > not in extras at present.
> >
> > It doesn't build against gcc4.
>
> Well technically it builds, but you get somewhat erratic runtime results :-)
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
> veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

yup builds fine since ages with gcc 4 if you disable sparc and the
compiler check.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux