Re: Results for install and remove tests for FC-Devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 16:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
Patrice Dumas napsal(a):
I may be completely wrong, but couldn't it be assumed that coreutils is always installed? A linux system without rm doesn't
make much sense...
Not during installation :)  anaconda uses package dependencies to order
the package installation correctly.

Yeah, but coreutils is a mandatory component of the "core" group in
comps.  It will always be at the top of the input to tsort, and tsort
won't move it later except when it's inserting something above it to
satisfy a coreutils (or the 4 packages in front of it) dependency.


Absolutely true, thats why i said those errors are really just for completeness as real installations always have to install those components. The other errors though like chkconfig and the other prereqs on the other hand are "real" errors in the sense that chkconfig isn't anywhere to be found in comps.xml and only gets pulled in if it's really required.

Read ya, Phil

--
Philipp Knirsch      | Tel.:  +49-711-96437-470
Development          | Fax.:  +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH         | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil@xxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web:   http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
Motd:  You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux