Hi, > > Other than it trashing oowriter etc in /usr/bin and installing in /opt, > > it looks okay so far. If it fails, do you want it filing under x86_64 > > OOo? > > No, I'm not interested in packaging bugs, these are rpms from the OOo > build process, not "proper" distro rpms :-) So far the only four I've found are minor 1. It gives some strange errors when you first fire it up about importing previous version information - it's looking in the OOo 1.1.3 directories instead of the 2.0 ones 2. The default font has changed from the one I set up in the "proper" distro rpms (I have it set on Arial) 3. It has decided to default the dictionary back to the US one rather than the one I had set (English). 4. As I'm learning German, I had the UI set to German. It's now in English. This could be down to a langpack problem though. I doubt any of these warrant a BZ entry. TTFN Paul -- "Logic, my dear Zoe, is merely the ability to be wrong with authority" - Dr Who -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
