> Speaking of DRI, I have an ATI 200M. Using clean install of xorg driver, I > see this: > > (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support > > [...] > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address) > [ repeat 255 times ...] > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] drmOpen failed > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. > > I think I mentioned this here before, and IIRC someone else said they have > exactly the same result. Is this expected behavior? > > /sbin/lsmod > Module Size Used by > radeon 141665 0 > drm 117481 1 radeon > > drm is loaded, but there are no /dev/dri/<anything> Same thing here with an ATI FireGL X1 (R300 chipset) on an Itanium workstation. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list