-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:52 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> In order to pull in packagers like those maintaining Dries, Dag >>> Weirs, freshrpms, and others, and in order to assure Fedora >>> users that their packages would work instead of saying, "if you >>> don't use official packages, you're on your own," has there >>> been any conversation on taking an example from Debian and >>> having a non-free repository? It would also free up the >>> packagers who spend so much time duplicating each other's >>> packages in order to ensure compatibility. I know there are >>> issues with their ffmpeg and mp3 codecs, but could these issues >>> be solved simply by designating their repositories as >>> non-free? I think it would greatly enhance the Fedora >>> experience, IMHO as a loyal FC user since Yarrow. >> >> Personally, I'd love to see everything under one roof or failing >> that, have freshrpms and livna have the equivalent of a rawhide >> build. > > > http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/development/ > > These are not the packages you are looking for... > > josh > using the force there? q;o) - -- Eric Mesa ericsbinaryworld@xxxxxxxxx http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and that the email was not changed in transit. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD+841PvU+8ApmWXIRAuEDAJkBy2E7qmQtBQw96rb6ymDfZ+j1WgCdGGM8 8jaIJ+dBBATqNPuA/IKIRAY= =nB/2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
