On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:54 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > * this doesn't match to their FAQ, where they claim to be wanting to aim > > at OSI compatibility. > > Yep, but in the previous question they explain that the licence isn't > allready OSI compatible: They clearly expressed their intention, and thereby significantly weaken their written license. In front of a German they would be facing very difficult times because of this. > > What concerns me much more on Fedora and Linux is OpenMotif's license > > not to being [L]GPL compatible. > > That shouldn't be an issue, if openmotif has a [L]GPL incompatible licence > but is shipped as shared libs. The GPL doesn't allow this, the LGPL does. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
