Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
I think that this issue is not specific of fedora. The issue comes from
upstream where incompatible api or abi are used. And it widely depends on
which package you're looking at. For example glibc is very stable (thanks
No it is not, but this does not mean that Fedora could not or should not
address it.
Trying to shoehorn a ABI or API policy within Fedora would take a large
amount of work without upstream involved in the decisions.
Since this distribution is touching the cutting-edge Linux
solutions, it could steer the community to focus more on architectural
design which could bring more benefits than binning backwards
compatibility to support the latest driver hack (just an example).
Concentrate and help fix problems on the individual projects instead of
drawing out grandiose plans.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list