On 2/14/06, Mike Klinke <lsomike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not sure I understand your suggestion. Are you suggesting that the > bugzilla search/interface cannot be improved? No.. of course it can be improved.. I'm suggesting that your example does nothing but state the obvious fact that google has a better search algorithm than bugzilla... and the statement of that obvious fact doesn't help us identify how the bugzilla search can be made better specifically. I'm suggesting that there is very little to be learned from the specific comparison to google. I'm saying that since we are incapable of examining the details of how google search works, there is very little to be gleamed from looking at example output from google at all. The magic in the google search is the search algorithm which produces the results. And its exactly that piece of magic which we don't have access to to examine and reuse. Are you really suggesting that we blindly reverse-engineer the google search algorithm and apply it to bugzilla? -jef"breaking news! google..which basis its whole business model on being an search service..has a great proprietary search algorthim..film at 11"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
