Jeff Spaleta writes:
> On 2/10/06, Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx (Jeff Spaleta) writes:
> >
> > > since jonas was moved in/out of core's development tree.. some of the
> > > review process for submission may not apply..
> >
> > Which part of the process do you mean here? The legal-issue check seems
> > to be the only item which can be skipped.
>
> I could absolutely be wrong about my interpretation. I thought
> packages which use to be in Core were considered orphaned and could be
> moved into Extras without new submission review?
It says here:
1.
Packages, which need a new maintainer (orphaned packages). A
package may need to be dropped from the distribution when it
contains security vulnerabilities, gets out-of-date too much
and/or becomes incompatible with build dependencies.
And it seems to me that JOnAS and its dependencies fit into this
category, having been dropped mainly because of dbuild dependency
issues. I doubt very much that any of these packages can reasonably
be described as "new submissions" -- if build problems hadn't cropped
up they would have been in FC5.
But on the other hand, they never made it into FC5.
I don't mind, really, as long as the work involved in pushing these 30
packages into extras isn't great.
Andrew.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
