2006/2/10, Benjy Grogan <benjy.grogan@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On 2/1/06, Mike A. Harris <mharris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Benjy Grogan wrote: > > > I hear that in a week or so Novell will be releasing the source code to > > > XGL for X11 7.0. Will it be possible to have XGL available in Extras > > > for FC5? I'm guessing it's one of those new X11 modules that v7.0 is > > > all about. But I know little about XGL and would like to test it out to > > > know more. It's going to be in NLD 10 in a few months. > > > > There are a lot of X related "goodies" that are up and coming in the > > X development world, including technologies being developed by Red Hat, > > Novell, Sun, and various others in the community. The current plan for > > Fedora Core 5, is to ship X11R7.0 as the official X implementation, > > including the Xorg X server. > > > > The various developmental/experimental technologies being developed > > by the above parties will most likely be available to Fedora users in > > one form or another over time, however everything is quite experimental > > at the current point in time to make any solid speculation for the > > inclusion of other components into Fedora Core 5 at this time. > > > > Maybe Fedora could do something like was done with SELinux? Where it was > available in FC2 but not by default. In an update for X11 from 7.0 to 7.1 > for FC5 the Xgl branch could be included along with instructions on how to > enable it. This is how Novell will be introducing Xgl to it's NLD10 > distribution. It seems like a good way to get Xgl tested early and it's the > perfect place for it to take place, in Fedora. > > I'm eager to see how Xgl works. :) And then I guess compiz would be the > next request. ;) > > Benji > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > would be pretty sweet. composite is dealt with the same way... disabled by default but "available" ;) regards, Rudolf Kastl p.s. if its an optional setting and isnt yet perfect i see it as rather uncritical and bugreports keep on flowing. ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
