Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:47:52 +0000, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>Actually quite encouraging, we'll see if "busybox" and "newlib" or >>"uclibc" form part of Rehdat's concept. > > You must be raving mad to suggest uclibc. Was that supposed to be a > sarcastic pun on the miniscule RAM spec? What do you see shrivelling up and dying from contact with uclibc? I am using it here with good success, admittedly on a limited range of apps, but all stuff like coreutils and packages at that level like procps and so on are fine, as is openssl, php and lighttpd. What is your opinion about newlib? -Andy
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
