2006/2/7, Brian Long <brilong@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:14 -0700, Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > > On Friday 03 February 2006 11:44am, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:45 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: > > > > That reminds me... Has anyone ever tried to tie mock and ccache > > > > together somehow? It seems like that would speed up repeated build > > > > attempts noticably. > > > > > > It is potentially possible, but the problem is that ccache has in the > > > past caused build issues from time to time for various people outside of > > > mock. I dare not think what chaos it could wreak in a semi-automated > > > buildsystem. distcc *might* be a better choice, once it's ready. > > > > Instead of distcc, how about considering icecream? > > Interesting. http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=icecream > > We use Teambuilder (mentioned in the IceCream wiki) for distributed > builds. It's a commercial product from Trolltech. > > /Brian/ > -- > Brian Long | | | > IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||. > Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. > Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > Hello well my opinion is that there should be config hooks to easily hook in components like ccache distcc and/or icecream. regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
