Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I didnt claim that all updates need to be pushed to the testing > repository however if there are exceptions then the rationale behind > those exceptions should be better communicated and in case of general > guidelines, better documented. Security fixes for might directly go > into updates repository while major revisions of packages should go > through updates-testing repository is a simple enough policy to enforce > for example. I dont for a moment believe that all potential issues or > regressions in updates would be caught in the updates-testing repository > however there is a potential to have less issues when the testing > repository is used by testers who might provide better feedback. The > problem is not necessarily what we do but a communication gap in why we > do it , the way we do it. At the very least, it provides a nice comeback when people complain that update X broke feature Y for them. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx ======================================================================== -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
