On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:36 +0900, Jens Petersen wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:46:52 -0500 > Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the > > logic behind this? > > Right various languages should probably be added to comps: this will > certainly happen for Indian scripts at least which I'm currently > working on. If it's required by other packages, it should just be required by those packages instead of requiring an explicit selection. > On the other hand of course not every language needs to be comps either: > I don't think most Swedes say need to have m17n-db-swedish installed > for example. If it doesn't need to be in comps, then why does it need to be shipped? Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
