Re: Stateless Linux: lxterminal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2006/1/27, Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 11:00 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> >
> > In what is it different from the quite mature ltsp project:
> > http://www.ltsp.org/ ?
>
> It is not a separate distribution -- it runs the _exact_ same
> software that's installed on the server. As such, it's simpler
> to maintain, simpler to understand due to its familiarity
> (if you run FC, like I do, you know it well, and I don't have
> to learn a new distro), and in environments where distros must be
> approved you don't have to push LTSP.
>
> It's a minimalist take on LTSP, 100% based on Fedora/Red Hat.
> Hence the post to this list :)
>
> --
> Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Lattica, Inc.
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

Why not create a sourceforge.net project for your approach?`even if it
maybe wont be the _one_ solution to kill all problems that go into
that direction and even if it might be obsoleted by stateless linux at
some point it time it could still be a simple solution that just works
for its specific task. just my opinion.

regards,
rudolf kastl

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux