2006/1/27, Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 11:00 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > > > > In what is it different from the quite mature ltsp project: > > http://www.ltsp.org/ ? > > It is not a separate distribution -- it runs the _exact_ same > software that's installed on the server. As such, it's simpler > to maintain, simpler to understand due to its familiarity > (if you run FC, like I do, you know it well, and I don't have > to learn a new distro), and in environments where distros must be > approved you don't have to push LTSP. > > It's a minimalist take on LTSP, 100% based on Fedora/Red Hat. > Hence the post to this list :) > > -- > Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Lattica, Inc. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > Why not create a sourceforge.net project for your approach?`even if it maybe wont be the _one_ solution to kill all problems that go into that direction and even if it might be obsoleted by stateless linux at some point it time it could still be a simple solution that just works for its specific task. just my opinion. regards, rudolf kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
