On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:27:07PM +0100, Marcus Hartig wrote: > 4.0.0 in the German pc magazine c't www.heise.de/ct where all expensive > and different tests they made with -Os are much slower, than with -O2 or > higher on a "normal" desktop system compiled. Individually each -O2 performs better than -Os, cumulatively the results are often quite different. You still need to get some careful tuning in - eg I build gnome -Os but build the gdk pixbuf libraries -O2 because they are so performance critical and small > for myself from rawhide. A special baby is firefox, where -Os slows > rendering down and I compile it with more better rpm opt flags. Probably some bits could do with a tune for the right flags. Alan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
