libc-client-2004g (core) vs uw-imap-2004g (extras)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: libc-client-2004g (core) vs uw-imap-2004g (extras)
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:29:15 -0600
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

FYI, looks like we may have some core vs extras stomping again:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/179017

-- Rex

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Prev by Date: Re: RPM groups and comps groups, was: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?
Next by Date: Re: RPM groups and comps groups, was: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?
Previous by thread: Re: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?
Next by thread: Re: Fedora Core 4 Test Update: udev-071-0.FC4.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux