On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 17:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Very true. We shouldnt be over blowing the importance of core. Do file a > bug report against the specific package and highlight the rationale. But what about once you put Extras on there? No longer is it just Fedora Core. This is why I've been keeping the 'Fedora Linux' naming scheme on my backburner. Fedora Linux could define anything that which is Fedora Core + Extras + Legacy. The term 'Core' is very restrictive when talking about the whole. I feel a parallel argument would be the 'Linux' vs 'GNU/Linux' argument. (BTW I'm in favor of just Linux). Once you start to try and quantify a term, then you have to be complete about it, GNU/BSD/etc.../Linux. Gets to be quite a mouthful (; -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
