On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 11:49 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Monday, January 23, 2006 4:06 am, Florian La Roche wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:10:56AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > >> > Can we have dbus-qt back and KDE built with D-Bus support > >> > in time for FC5? > >> > >> Yes, dbus-qt bindings will be back. > > > > And KDE will be built with HAL support? I'm looking forward to testing! > > Not without patching. The newly backported dbus-qt bindings are not > api-compatible with the old ones. If they are ported to those I will also be willing to enable that since they are maintained. However the best option would have been for KDE to either use the lowlevel d-bus/hal bindings or bring the bits they did use from the old bindings into the KDE tree so at least those bits are maintained. From what the upstream developers have all told me, which is what I have to go on, KDE doesn't use the bindings for much anyway (mainly just the mainloop integration), so bringing in a whole unmaintained library is not an option. -- John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
