Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:52:18PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > > Mike A. Harris <mharris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Sure, the system isn't perfect. And the situation you describe is > > > entirely feasible. However, I've seen bugs reported in which it is > > > perfectly clear that a user has never even attempted to see if there > > > was a duplicate, because their subject line or other aspects of their > > > bug were almost word for word identical to one or more other bug > > > reports, etc. > > It would be quite useful to show bugs (perhaps the most recent ones?) for > > the selected component. As things stand, you have to go search (select > > package, etc; and the search isn't very intuitive as it stands) and if not > > found, file a bug (again, select package etc). For me at least (far > > away in network terms) this is slow and somewhat irritating. > You can save a query once you're logged in, and it appears as a > pseudo-bookmark at the bottom of each bugzilla page. I create one for > kernel for each release, and use it countless times per day. I only ever > use search if I'm looking for something in particular, like 'bugs > pertaining to snd-nm256'. That last one is my usual case, tripping over bugs in random packages. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
