On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:07 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 11:32 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:17 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > > Quoting "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters mac com>: > > > > > > > Not everyone feels the need to fix what isn't broken > > > > > > Yes. Maybe these people should have stayed on Red Hat Linux 5.0 then? > > > > It's been less than a year since FC3 was the CURRENT version. > > Let's not make a strawman out of the issue. > > I think the thing that should be much more clearly pointed out than it > currently is, is the fact that any given FC release is a *very* > short-lived distribution. People install FC<whatever> because they heard > somebody talk about how cool distro it is, without realizing AT ALL that > the version they're installing is about to go EOL in two months or so. s/EOL/into maintenance mode/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
