On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 19:02 -0800, Ian Burrell wrote: > On 1/17/06, Naoki <naoki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Howdy Y'all, > > > > I don't have, nor will I ever have, a palm pilot. Do we need to have > > evolution depending on it ? > > > > evolution-2.5.4-6.i386.rpm : > > <snip> > > gnome-pilot >= 2.0.13 > > <snip> > > > > It would be possible to split out the pilot conduits into a > subpackage. Only the conduits in /usr/lib64/evolution/2.6/conduits > and /usr/lib64/gnome-pilot/conduits depend on gnome-pilot and > pilot-link. > > Of course, since you didn't enter a bug, nobody will look at it. Obviously because it was not a bug report, but a question.. Funny how work can put me in a foul mood. So if the answer is "No, we don't need gnome-pilot as a dependency." then I will make a formal request. wheeee. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list