On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:34 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 10:49 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 07:11 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > One thing I've always wondered is why a Python namespace isn't being > > > used even though it's one of the primary languages used in Fedora. It > > > doesn't make any sense to me why they aren't implemented. Does anyone > > > have a reasonable explanation of why not? > > > > So does no one else see this as an issue? Or is this the wrong list for > > such an inquiry? > > It's mostly a matter of 'round 'tuits. :-/ > > We should definitely try to make sure it gets done for FC6, though. If > someone wants to go ahead and get the necessary changes lined up, that > would make it a bit easier to do as well I was made aware of the following by the poster: http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2004-08/msg04482.php I don't have time to look at it in detail atm, but it looks promising. The only issues I can see are with packages missing __init__.py and zipped eggs, but even those can be handled with a bit more code. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
