Re: Squirrelmail [was Re: Dovecot 1.0]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:28:59PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >has been waiting for some maintainer action for two months and a half
> >
> >The report points some easy fixes :
> >
> >-Requires: httpd, php >= 4.0.4, perl, tmpwatch >= 2.8, aspell
> >+Requires: httpd, php >= 4.0.4, php-mbstring, perl, tmpwatch >= 2.8, aspell
> >
> >-find -name '*.mo' |xargs rm
> >+#find -name '*.mo' |xargs rm
> 
> Too bad it's not in extras, since I'm the upstream packager for 
> squirrelmail. :)

Does anything in Core require squirrelmail?  If not, sounds like the 
perfect opportunity to move it to Extras.

If a package is unmaintained in Core, and there is a willing 
maintainer, then it should be moved to Extras.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux