Re: Why not /usr/bin64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why not /usr/bin64?
From: Ralf Ertzinger <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:09:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <dqb1k1$thp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: [NDC] :)
References: <dqb1k1$thp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Neal Becker schrieb:

> 1) 32bit in /usr/bin32, 64bit in /usr/bin64, and /usr/bin->/usr/bin64
> 2) 32bit in /usrbin32, 64bit in /usr/bin

Nice solution. However, what exactly is the problem that this solves?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not /usr/bin64?
  - From: Neal Becker

References:
- Why not /usr/bin64?
  - From: Neal Becker

Prev by Date: Re: ugly cursor? How did the story end?
Next by Date: Re: rawhide report: 20060114 changes - NVIDIA driver fix
Previous by thread: Why not /usr/bin64?
Next by thread: Re: Why not /usr/bin64?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]