On 1/12/06, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. if it is redundant with nautilus why didn't you propose to remove it > before ? because I didnt use it to "browse" I i used it for to "manage" via its catalog and library functionality. Since i didn't use its redundant browsing features I didn't fully understand how redundantly redundant it actually was. For what I was attempting to use it for, f-spot overlaps. For what you have described to me as "browsing" functionality that i never used, I feel that nautilus/eog overlap. > 2. you still have to prove your assertion that the gthumb mode is useless > for most fedora users Im very sure i did not at any point assert that browsing was useless. I said i was unsure that it was more important than management. I've ground my arguments in my personal ancedotal experience, I'm not the one throwing hyperbole around. I can't compete with you on that score. > > I don't ask for any change so I don't need to do anything but blow holes > in your arguments. Which is rather easy since they boil out to "I pray > that with f-spot my wife may not feel obligated to boot into windows to > use picasa, and I feel gthumb is useless" I have not until this very post written the word "useless" in this thread. Anyone bothering to keep score and has an active gmail cache can verify that for you if you are incapable of your own fact checking. Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. I'm more than capable of speaking for myself. -jef"Attention OSnews... there's a potential new staff writer in this thread"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
