Le mercredi 11 janvier 2006 à 23:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > We don't even know what > packages are being used in Fedora or how many users there are in total. > Assumptions about anything like that is merely that, at this point. Which is why removing gthumb just because a different app got included is the wrong thing to do. Especially when the package proposed for removal 1. is clean and low-volume 2. does not pull in stupid deps like openmotif, xpdf, or a complete new language stack 3. does not mess with the FHS 4. is properly localised 5. is the one core users know and use 6. provide features the new one does not If anything f-spot should have proven itself into FE before being considered for core. I'm not asking for its removal now it's in. However since f-spot didn't follow the normal review process, it will have to be beaten into shape in core, and before this is done and we know all the pros and cons between f-spot and other core apps arguing for removal of these other apps is way premature (and not very gracious) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
