-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ed Hill wrote: > > I understand that OpenMPI is supposed to [at least, for some people's > perception! ;-)] become the "one true MPI" implementation that eclipses > all others due to its very cool new modular design and other features. > But, even so, I think it would be a good idea to have and maintain other > MPI versions (such as MPICH v1 & v2, LAM, etc.) in Extras so that people > have some flexibility. And to do that, we'll very likely need to setup > the multiple MPI packages using alternatives. While we are thinking about this, it would be good to be able to support multiple versions of a particular MPI compiled with different compilers. Locally I maintain LAM compiled with PGF90 and IFORT and it would be nice to be able to have all three installed simultaneously. - - Orion -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDvWycORnzrtFC2/sRAqV4AJ0XmKYeeGFHXgLR0YOKh307a08cTwCfTNEm b2XWFDI9BgSzqsIvcOvICHk= =lUth -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
