On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 01:05 -0800, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > Axel, I have to agree with Rahul here. While it isn't "broken", per se, its > definitely an issue. There are quite a few people who are rather adverse to > the way ATrpms, if enabled in full, replaces core packages, but still want to > use a number of ATrpms packages. smart does an excellent job at that - you can give third party repositories a lower priority than base/updates/extras - but give individual packages within the third party repositories a higher priority. I would suggest that people who want to use third party repositories use something like smart (which is available from the third party repositories, and I think I saw it recently being reviewed for Extras) opposed to yum. With that in mind, yum plugins that are disabled/enabled won't matter, since yum won't be being used for that repo management. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
