On Friday 30 December 2005 01:01, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 29 December 2005 09:18, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: [...] > > Then use a 3rd party repo that does not override Fedora Core or Extras > > RPMS. Yes, such a repo exists, but no, I still has no mythtv -- nobody > > stepped up to package it there. Any volunteers? > > /me raises hand. :) > > I already have a fair amount of involvement with mythtv as maintainer of > its stable code branch and my work on the ATrpms-provided mythtv packages. > Unfortunately, there are some issues of reality to deal with. I'd love to > see mythtv into Extras and, but the mythtv source code itself contains > ffmpeg, which itself is already banished from Extras. Whoops, misread what Thorsten said, I think. I don't think he was advocating for mythtv into Extras, he was talking about putting it into another repo. What's wrong with the ATrpms version? Is it simply a matter of principle that people refuse to use the ATrpms package(s), since ATrpms can/does override core packages? A protectbase option seems like an idea solution for that, so why dismiss it w/"use a repo that doesn't override"... -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpClXTnwNvze.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
