On 12/29/05, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@xxxxxxx> wrote: > None of those are "base" packages, but you won't find me complaining if > livna took the Fedora sox spec file and added libmad-devel and > lame-devel to the BuildRequires ... which would be a "base" package > being replaced ... "protectbase" doesnt mean "base" if you look back at the original post.. he added protectbase functionality to extras as well. And if you wanted to turn protectbase on by default you'd have put Extras in the protection pool... there is nothing stopping something moving into Core out of Extras as part of a new dependancy for a Core update. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
