On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 11:50 -0500, Brian Long wrote: > > Nope. I don't know that it's up to me or the Fedora project to contact > each third-party repo maintainer when Fedora implements a change. I'm > asking Fedora to consider a change. I agree. If it messes up a third party repository, the third party repository can instruct users to disable it if using the repository. That might clue some users in that they really don't want to messing with third party due to the implications (changing core packages) while allowing those who do to alter the settings. Replacing core rpm's with third party rpm's is not recommended imho. In fact - I would even suggest protecting FC Extras (though perhaps not by default). That being said - I probably would disable the plugin (or make an exception for a few packages) since I rebuild sox for mp3 support on my boxes - but I think the default should be that users have to take a step to disable protection, not take a step to enable protection. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
